Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 22:48:21 GMT -5
Although this behavior of the defendant woman made it impossible for the plaintiff husband to live together; Since it is understood that there is no continuity; It was not found correct to make a written decision by accepting the reason for divorce in Article 163 of the Turkish Civil Code as living a dishonorable life. Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber, 26.06.2012, 2011/22536 E., 2012/17686 K. In order to be able to talk about a dishonorable life and therefore decide on divorce, relationships with others must be adopted as a lifestyle and living in this way must be more or less continuous. It is understood from the investigation and evidence collected that the defendant showed promiscuous behavior and had many conversations with other men via SMS and in the virtual environment. These actions of the defendant and the evidence collected were not deemed sufficient to accept that he was leading a dishonorable life.
So what; It is clear and indisputable that these behaviors France Telegram Number Data violate the obligation to ensure the happiness of the marital union and remain faithful to one's spouse in Article 185 of the Turkish Civil Code, and undermine the marital union and the continuation of the joint life to a degree that is not expected from the other spouse. The specific reason for dishonorable living is also in accordance with Article 166/1 of the Turkish Civil Code. Although this behavior of the defendant woman made it impossible for the plaintiff husband to live together; Since it is understood that there is no continuity; It was not found correct to make a written decision by accepting the reason for divorce in Article 163 of the Turkish Civil Code as living a dishonorable life. Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber, 26.06.2012, 2011/22536 E., 2012/17686 K.
In order to be able to talk about a dishonorable life and therefore decide on divorce, relationships with others must be adopted as a lifestyle and living in this way must be more or less continuous. It is understood from the investigation and evidence collected that the defendant showed promiscuous behavior and had many conversations with other men via SMS and in the virtual environment. These actions of the defendant and the evidence collected were not deemed sufficient to accept that he was leading a dishonorable life. So what; It is clear and indisputable that these behaviors violate the obligation to ensure the happiness of the marital union and remain faithful to one's spouse in Article 185 of the Turkish Civil Code, and undermine the marital union and the continuation of the joint life to a degree that is not expected from the other spouse. The specific reason for dishonorable living is also in accordance with Article 166/1 of the Turkish Civil Code.
So what; It is clear and indisputable that these behaviors France Telegram Number Data violate the obligation to ensure the happiness of the marital union and remain faithful to one's spouse in Article 185 of the Turkish Civil Code, and undermine the marital union and the continuation of the joint life to a degree that is not expected from the other spouse. The specific reason for dishonorable living is also in accordance with Article 166/1 of the Turkish Civil Code. Although this behavior of the defendant woman made it impossible for the plaintiff husband to live together; Since it is understood that there is no continuity; It was not found correct to make a written decision by accepting the reason for divorce in Article 163 of the Turkish Civil Code as living a dishonorable life. Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber, 26.06.2012, 2011/22536 E., 2012/17686 K.
In order to be able to talk about a dishonorable life and therefore decide on divorce, relationships with others must be adopted as a lifestyle and living in this way must be more or less continuous. It is understood from the investigation and evidence collected that the defendant showed promiscuous behavior and had many conversations with other men via SMS and in the virtual environment. These actions of the defendant and the evidence collected were not deemed sufficient to accept that he was leading a dishonorable life. So what; It is clear and indisputable that these behaviors violate the obligation to ensure the happiness of the marital union and remain faithful to one's spouse in Article 185 of the Turkish Civil Code, and undermine the marital union and the continuation of the joint life to a degree that is not expected from the other spouse. The specific reason for dishonorable living is also in accordance with Article 166/1 of the Turkish Civil Code.